Housing agendas are valuable because they reveal sites, applicants, legal capacity, affordability terms, and conditions. They become misleading when every action is flattened into one category called pipeline.

A preliminary plan can authorize more homes than a developer ultimately proposes. A planning approval can remain unbuilt while financing and building permits are assembled. A zoning ordinance can take effect, be voided by a court, and later return. A large redevelopment can enter construction while most residential blocks remain incomplete.

Five records, five current states

Current state reflects official records checked through August 2, 2026.
CaseInitial authorityLater official statusCorrect reading
Mosby Court South, RichmondPreliminary plan permits no more than 500 dwellingsRRHA still describes the project as in planningA maximum development envelope, not a committed buildout
1171 Sonora Court, SunnyvaleSpecial development permit for 172 unitsApproved project, pending building permitsA planning entitlement with financing and permit gates still open
Expanded Housing Options, ArlingtonBy-right zoning path adopted in 2023Applications resumed after appellate reversal; litigation continuedActive zoning approval path, not a building permit
WestEnd, AlexandriaMaster-plan amendments, rezoning, and concept plan approvedSite active in construction; blocks remain separately stagedSite-wide implementation without a single project-wide completion state
Bunker Hill, Boston2,699-unit master redevelopment approvedFirst building complete and occupied; second under constructionPartial delivery within a much larger phased program

Richmond: a maximum program, still in planning

On June 8, 2026, the Richmond City Council adopted Ordinance 2026-106 for Mosby Court South. The preliminary community unit plan covers 1804 and 1930 P Street. It permits up to 600,000 square feet of residential development, no more than 500 dwellings, and up to 25,000 square feet of ground-floor commercial space on about 12.84 acres.

Those figures define the outer envelope of the preliminary plan. They are not a final unit program or construction schedule. The Richmond Redevelopment and Housing Authority continues to describe the project as being in the planning phase and lists resident engagement and relocation planning activities in 2026.

The correct status is preliminary plan adopted, redevelopment planning active, construction not established. A useful database stores 500 as an authorized maximum, not as future delivery.

Sunnyvale: approved, but awaiting another permit layer

Sunnyvale's 1171 Sonora Court project demonstrates the space between a planning entitlement and construction. On March 23, 2026, the Planning Commission approved a special development permit for a seven-story, 172-unit development. The official record identifies 170 affordable units and two manager units at APN 205-50-024.

The City's current affordable-housing page labels it Approved project, pending building permits. Sunnyvale's fiscal 2026-2027 project budget also describes the project as being in predevelopment and says the developer is pursuing additional financing.

The project has municipal land and funding actions, planning approval, and a specific housing program. The official sources do not yet place it in construction. Entitled units are not permitted units, and permitted units are not completed homes.

Arlington: zoning policy can leave and return

On March 22, 2023, the Arlington County Board adopted Expanded Housing Options zoning. The ordinance allowed qualifying properties in five residential districts to pursue duplexes, semidetached homes, townhouses, and small multifamily buildings under stated standards. The policy also imposed an annual cap of 58 EHO permits.

A Circuit Court ruling voided the amendments on September 27, 2024, and normal EHO review stopped. The Virginia Court of Appeals later reversed and remanded. Arlington made the EHO permit type available for new applications again on October 1, 2025.

The County's May 20, 2026 update says a matter before the Virginia Supreme Court had not halted EHO development. The same page states the operational distinction plainly: an EHO permit grants zoning approval, but does not authorize construction or occupancy and does not replace building, trades, or occupancy approvals.

Alexandria: one master approval became many projects

Alexandria approved the framework for redevelopment of the former Landmark Mall on July 6, 2021. The action included master-plan amendments, rezoning, and a coordinated development concept plan. The concept documentation allowed up to 2,500 dwellings under its stated assumptions. That was potential capacity within a site-wide envelope, not a final count assigned to construction-ready buildings.

The City's current Landmark and Van Dorn page lists later submissions and approvals by block. A separate April 2026 project page says the WestEnd site was actively under construction by fall 2025 and that transit-street infrastructure had been built.

The site can therefore be under construction while particular residential blocks remain in permitting, design review, later approval, or future phases. The public record needs a site-level status and linked block-level statuses, not one indivisible delivery event.

Boston: approval became partial delivery through phases

Boston's Bunker Hill redevelopment provides the longest delivery arc in this group. The City's current project record describes a 2,699-unit mixed-income redevelopment across 15 residential buildings at 55 Bunker Hill Street.

The first building began construction in 2023. By April 28, 2026, the Boston Housing Authority reported that the 102-unit Stellata had been delivered in January 2025 and was fully occupied. The same BHA announcement marked the start of construction on a second, 266-unit building with 208 market-rate and 58 deeply affordable units.

Bunker Hill has reached construction and partial completion. The full 2,699-unit redevelopment remains a multi-building program. The master-plan count was not wrong. It described a different unit of analysis from the homes completed in 2025 or under construction in 2026.

The housing record is a chain, not a count

For each action, record:

  • The exact parcel, address, or policy geography.
  • The applicant, owner, and acting public body.
  • The exact action and procedural disposition.
  • Whether a unit count is proposed, maximum, approved, permitted, under construction, completed, or occupied.
  • The conditions, financing, and approvals that remain.
  • Any continuance, appeal, expiration, withdrawal, or judicial ruling.
  • The latest official status and verification date.

The primary stages should remain separate: proposed, filed, recommended, approved, permitted, under construction, completed, and occupied. The record also needs branches for continued, revised, appealed, voided, expired, and withdrawn.

What these cases support

  • Municipal records can establish legal capacity, approvals, conditions, permit status, construction, and completion when those stages are separately sourced.
  • Maximum and up to figures should be stored as ceilings, not forecasts.
  • Later official status can materially qualify an earlier approval.
  • Large sites require both program-level and phase- or block-level records.

What they do not support

  • No case estimates the probability or timing of construction.
  • No zoning or planning approval proves financing, engineering feasibility, demand, absorption, or profitability.
  • Site-wide construction does not mean every residential phase is under construction.
  • The five cases are not a national housing-pipeline estimate.

Sources and method

Research was checked through August 2, 2026. Each initial approval was matched to a later official project, permit, litigation, implementation, construction, or completion record. Counts retain the qualifiers used by the source.

  1. Richmond: Ordinance 2026-106; RRHA Mosby Court South status.
  2. Sunnyvale: planning approval; current affordable-housing status; fiscal 2026-2027 project budget.
  3. Arlington: 2023 adoption; litigation, restart, and permit status.
  4. Alexandria: master approval and block records; concept plan; current site status.
  5. Boston: master project record; April 2026 construction and occupancy update.

This is a public-record housing-workflow example. It is not land-use, housing, legal, planning, development, financial, or investment advice.